Repulpable container insulation products and methods of making and using same

ABSTRACT

Container insulation including a batt comprised of large paper particles, at least 90% of which by weight are greater than 10 mm in diameter. Less than 5% by weight binder fibers are used, which have a length of at least 20 mm. Most preferably, no binder fibers are used. Where the batts are faced with paper, the paper is coated with a biodegradable coating. The resulting product is repulpable and recyclable in accordance with Fiber Box Association (FBA) testing protocols.

CLAIM OF PRIORITY

This application claims priority to application Ser. No. 62/723,771,filed Aug. 28, 2018, and entitled REPULPABLE PACKAGING INSULATIONPRODUCTS AND METHODS OF MAKING AND USING SAME.

FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The present invention relates to the field of container insulation, asfor example packaging insulation, cup insulation, cooler insulation,envelope insulation, beverage container insulation or the like.

PRIOR ART

Corrugated cardboard containers are the most practical andcost-effective way to ship produce, meats, seafood and other items.Packaging insulation is used for shipping perishable items which must bekept cold during shipping. Individualized packages in which such itemsare shipped are lined with insulation to maintain the shipped item oritems at the appropriate temperature. Current packaging insulationproducts comprise semi rigid expanded styrene panels, polymer bagsstuffed with cotton, Kraft paper bags stuffed with cotton, cellulosicand thermoplastic fibrous batts. One problem with current packaginginsulation products is that it is not itself repulpable, and hencehampers the repulpability of the cardboard shipping container it hasbeen insulating. This creates costly environmental and disposalproblems.

Repulpability is a species of recyclability. An item or material isrecyclable if it can be collected and reused in some form. A cardboardor paper item or material is repulpable if it can undergo the operationof re-wetting and fiberizing for subsequent paper or cardboard sheetformation.

The Fiber Box Association (FBA) Elk Grove Village, Ill. has establisheddefinitions and tests for determining the repulpability andrecyclability of cardboard products. (Aug. 16, 2013, revision of the“Voluntary Standard for Repulping and Recycling Corrugated FiberboardTreated to Improve Its Performance in the Presence of Water and WaterVapor.”) This is an industry accepted testing protocol. In the FBA testfor repulpability, a 100% charge of “treated” corrugated is repulped ina Modified Waring Blender and a British Disintegrator in water at a pHof 7 (±0.5 pH) that is maintained at 125° F. (±10°) following theprocedure outlined in Appendix A. (The term “treated” as used in thetest is understood to mean the material being tested includes materialsother than the cellulosic fibers used to form paper or cardboardsheets.) The blender pulped material is separated in a screen with0.010-inch or smaller slots to determine fiber recovery as a percentageof the amount of fiber charged. To be deemed “repulpable,” fiber yieldfrom the repulpability test must be at least 80% based on the totalweight, or 85% based on the bone-dry fiber charge to the pulper.

The FBA also has an industry recognized recyclability test: Mix aminimum of 20% treated corrugated and the remainder of the sameuntreated corrugated in a laboratory-scale pulper at pH 7 (±0.5 pH) and125° F. (±100). This is the recyclability test sample. As a control, acharge of 100% of the same untreated corrugated is also pulped usingidentical conditions. Each pulped material is passed through (insuccession) a pressure screen equipped with a basket with 0.062-inchholes, the same screen or a similar screen equipped with a basket with0.010-inch slots and a reverse centrifugal separator under conditionsspecified in the procedure

U.S. Pat. No. 5,418,031 to English discloses batt style insulationcomprised of a blend of cellulosic material and thermoplastic fibrousmaterial, wherein the latter comprises between 3%-15% of the blend byweight, is formed by a method such as air-laying into a low density,high loft mat. The surface of the mat is flame-treated to melt thethermoplastic component on the surface, forming a skin which keeps thecellulosic component intact. A facing sheet can be applied to thesurface of the mat, as is done with conventional fiberglass batt-styleinsulation. The cellulosic material used by English is a free-flowingmixture of small cellulosic particles (about 1-10 mm in diameter) andshort cellulosic fibers (about 0.5-3 mm in length), such as that shownin U.S. Pat. No. 4,579,592, wherein the particulates take the form of alow-density collection of cellulosic fibers and cellulosic particles(small chips or splinters). Such material typically is produced bycomminuting recycled paper thereby resulting in approximately a 50/50mixture (by weight) of particles and fibers.

U.S. Published Patent Application 2018/0050857 purports to provide arecyclable insulated package using an insulative paper fiber padsubstructure with a density of less than about 10 pounds per cubic foot.The insulative paper fiber pad has entangled reinforcement fibers. Amethod of forming an insulative paper fiber pad usingrecycling-compatible or water-soluble adhesive and paper layers isprovided. The resulting product is said to have a repulpability ofgreater than 85% The method includes mixing paper reinforcement fiberswith between about 0.5% to about 25% by weight meltable PE/PPbi-component thermoplastic binder fiber having a length less than about16 mm. The PE/PP bi-component thermoplastic binder fibers aredistributed substantially randomly within the paper reinforcement fibersto form a mixture Heat is applied to the mixture to melt the PE/PPbi-component thermoplastic binder fiber to bind the PE/PP bi-componentthermoplastic binder fiber to the paper reinforcement fibers to form abatt.

The 2018/0050857 application indicates that preferably, the material canbe formed of about 10% bi-component fiber and about 90% recycledcardboard fiber. The bi-component fiber can be chopped and have a lengthof less than about 24 mm, less than about 16 mm, or a length betweenabout 0.5 mm to about 16 mm, and can be mixtures of two or more lengths,preferably between about 1 mm to about 16 mm. The mixtures of two ormore lengths can have ratios of from about 10% to about 90% of one fiberlength to another fiber length and can have an average length of lessthan about 16 mm.

A batt sample of about 1300GSM, consisted of about 90% cardboard withthe binder being about 10% (with about 50% 1 mm length bi-componentfiber and about 50% 6 mm length bi-component fiber). The '857application goes on to indicate that the bi-component fibers can bebetween about 0.5 mm and about 16 mm polyethylene and polypropylene(“PE/PP”) bi-component; and can be formed of about a 65/35 percent PE/PPmixture.

Thus, when paper particles are used as insulation, finely ground paperparticles about 1-10 mm in diameter are typically used, usually mixedwith short cellulosic fibers of about 0.5-3 mm in length, e.g. as inU.S. Pat. No. 5,418,031 to English. They are bound together in a battusing bi-component thermoplastic binder fibers of typically less than 16mm, and at levels of about 10-15% Batts of such material are typicallyfaced with LDPE coated Kraft paper on one or both sides, and often withwrapped edges.

It is commonly believed in the thermal insulation packaging industry tothat smaller cellulosic particles and fibers make better insulation byproviding more air pockets in the resulting batts. These smallerparticles and fibers are made by using an attrition mill. It is commonto use a plate type fiberizer set at a plate gap of one eighth inch.Other types of attrition mills could be used, such as a hammer mill. Theparticle size of hammer mills is determined by the openings of thescreen used. The resulting milled or fiberized material has smallparticles and small fibers, and a high dust content, e.g. 86% particlesof having a diameter of 2.35 mm to 6.35 mm, 12% of fibers havinggenerally less than 0.06 mm in length, and 2% dust. Batts pressed fromsuch material are “bagged,” that is totally enclosed in a plasticenvelope, or faced on both sides and their edges with Kraft paper orsimilar facing material.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

The present invention comprises packaging insulation for insertion intoa packaging container, which insulation includes a batt comprised oflarge paper particles, at least 90% of which are greater than 10 mm indiameter. Less than 5% binder fibers are used, which have a length of atleast 20 mm. Most preferably, no binder fibers are used. Where the battsare faced with paper, the paper is coated with a biodegradable coating.

The resulting method and product provides packaging insulation which canbe fitted to the interior of a cardboard box shipping container. Thepackaging insulation per se, and the container and insulation together,are re-pulpable, and recyclable as determined by the industry acceptedFiber Box Association (FBA) repulpability testing protocol andrecyclability testing protocol.

These and other features, advantages and objects of the invention willbe more readily understood and appreciated by reference to the drawings,description of the preferred embodiments, and claims.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 is a perspective view of a prior art panel of packaginginsulation, with facing paper peeled back;

FIG. 2 is a perspective view of circle II of FIG. 1, with a corner priedapart;

FIG. 3 is a perspective view of a preferred embodiment panel ofpackaging insulation, with facing paper peeled back;

FIG. 4 is a perspective view of circle IV of FIG. 3, with a corner priedapart;

FIG. 5 is an illustrative view of air entrained large paper particlesand long binder fibers being drawn into a batt and subjected tocompression;

FIG. 6 is a perspective view of two panels of packaging insulation cutto fit within a shipping container;

FIG. 7 is a perspective view of a cardboard shipping container withoutpackaging insulation;

FIG. 8 is a perspective view of the container of FIG. 3 lined with thepackaging insulation panels of FIG. 6;

FIG. 9 is a side elevational view of the compression equipment used toform the packaging insulation of the preferred embodiment; and

FIG. 10 is a top plan view of the compression equipment.

DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS

In the preferred embodiment, an insulating batt 10 is comprised of largepaper particles 11, at least 90% of which are greater than 10 mm indiameter. (FIGS. 3, 4 and 5) Less than 5% binder fibers 12 are used(FIG. 5), which have a length of at least 20 mm. Most preferably, nobinder fibers are used. In this embodiment, the batt 10 is faced withsheets of paper 20, coated with a biodegradable coating, resulting in alaminated insulation panel 1.

In contrast, the prior art insulating batts 100 a are made ofcellulosic/paper fibers, or a mixture of very small particles andfibers, as illustrated in prior art FIGS. 1 and 2. Very short binderfibers are used and the Kraft paper facing 200 is typically coated witha polymer such as LDPE.

The large paper particles 11 used in the present invention are madeusing an attrition mill with a plate spacing of about ½″. A hammer millwith appropriate screen openings and with an approximate gaping from1/16 to ¼″ between the rotor and the screen could also be used. Moisturein the form of water and steam is applied to the paper as it is milledin the attrition mill. Water is used at the rate of about one gallon perminute. A small amount of mineral oil is also used to effect dustsuppression.

The resulting paper particles 11 as collected have a moisture content ofbetween 10 and 20%, more preferably 14-16%. Prior to compression intobatt 10, the paper particles 11 have a relatively low density of 4-5grams per 8 volume ounces (0.017-0.021 g/cc.) In contrast, the typicalsmall particle/small fiber milled mixture has a significantly higherdensity of approximately 7.7 grams per 8 volume ounces (0.029-0.034g/cc). The difference in density can be visualized by comparing priorart FIG. 2 to prior art FIG. 4.

At least 90% of the particles 11 by weight are greater than 10 mm indiameter. A typical particle size distribution is shown in Table 1below.

Size (mm) Weight % Range Specific Example 10 mm or less Less than 5%4.70% 10-20 mm 50-60% 56.80% 20-30 mm 20-30% 22.04% 30-40 mm 10-20%12.44% 40 mm or greater Up to 5% 4.01%

The particles are irregular in configuration. They are not perfectlycircular. Thus, the term “diameter” as used to identify the size of theparticles refers to their longest dimension. This dimension isdetermined by inscribing 10 mm, 20 mm, 30 mm, and 40 mm circles on aflat surface and sizing each particle of a group of particles asproduced by attrition by determining which circle it fits into. Thesized particles are placed in groups according to their size andweighed, to facilitate determination of the percentage of each sizedgroup by weight. Preferably, one starts by screening out the fines usingfor example a screen with smaller than 10 mm diameter openings. One thenstarts with the 10 mm diameter circle and separates from the rest of theparticles those which fit into the 10 mm circle and adds them to thefines previously screened out. The remainder are sized in the 20 mmdiameter circle, and those which fit are separated from the remainder.This is repeated sequentially with the 30 mm and then 40 mm diametercircles. Each of the groups of particles so separated are weighed, andthe percentage by weight are determined based on the weight of the totalparticles subjected to the separation process. In the specific exampleof Table 1, the sample subjected to the separation weighed 20.9 grams.

The binder fiber can be any thermoplastic fiber which tackifies orpartially melts at temperatures at which the paper particle batt isheated prior to or during pressing e.g. 160° C. to about 195° C.,typically about 165 to 175° C. Preferably, a bi-component core-sheaththermoplastic binder fiber is used, in which the sheath has a lowermelting point than the core. The sheath and core can be of differentthermoplastic materials, such as polyethylene and polypropylene, or canbe the same type of plastic but with different melting points. Apreferred binder fiber is coextruded PET bi-component core-sheaththermoplastic binder fibers having a length of at least 20 mm, and adenier of 1d to 4d. Preferably these fibers have a length of from 22-32mm, and a denier of 1.5d.

The paper facing 20 used in the preferred embodiment is coated with abiodegradable coating, rather than with a polymer material such aslow-density polyethylene. The biodegradable coating serves to enhancethe paper's, and the batts, impermeability to moisture. A preferablecoating is a biomass derived polyester of the type disclosed in EuropeanPatent specification 1882712. It is sold commercially under thetrademark “Bio PBS” by Mitsubishi Chemical Company.

The paper used is preferably Kraft paper having a thickness of about 1to about 10 mils, more preferably about 2 to about 6 mils, and mostpreferably about 4 mils. From about 20# to about 60# Kraft Paper, morepreferably about 30# to about 40#, and most preferably about 35#, ispreferred. The presence of the binder fibers 12 in batt 10 may besufficient to adhere the Kraft paper 20 to batt 10 during the heating,compression and cooling process described below.

The paper particles 11 are mixed with the binder fibers 12 and deliveredby the flow of air into an air lay machine that forms a continuous battand delivers it to a continuously moving conveyor belt. This is shownillustratively in FIG. 5. The paper particles 11 and binder fibers 12mixture will be air laid to a thickness which is greater than, butappropriate to the final batt 10 thickness desired. A batt 10 as airlaid on the conveyor may vary widely, but from about 3 to about 6-inchthickness is typical. The air laid batt 10 is conveyed through an ovenat a temperature of about 175° C. to about 195° C., typically about 180to 185° C. The heat of the oven tackifies the sheath of the binderfibers 12 to assist in binding the paper particles 11 and binder fibers12 together and give the batt cohesion.

From the oven, the batt 10 is conveyed along to compressor 50 (FIGS. 5and 6). Compressor 50 comprises a series of upper and lower compressionrollers 51 a-b, 53 a-b, 55 a-b, 57 a-b and 59 a-b which respectivelycarry a conveyor belt 50 a and 50 b, made of a low friction materialsuch as Teflon. Located between the compression rollers, are compressionplates 52 a-b, 54 a-b, 56 a-b and 58 a-b, which press against the upperand lower Teflon conveyor belts 50 a and 50 b. The Teflon conveyor belts50 a and 50 b slide over and past the compression plates.

As paper particle batt 10 is fed between the upper and lower Teflonconveyor belts 50 a and 50 b, at upper and lower starter rolls 51 a and51 b, the biodegradable coated paper facing stock is fed from one of theupper rolls 40 a under the upper Teflon conveyor belt 50 a at top roll51 a and from one of the lower rolls 40 b over the lower Teflon conveyorbelt 50 b at bottom roll 51 b so as to be applied to both opposite sidesof the passing fibrous batt 10 (FIG. 5). Two separate top feed stockrolls 40 a can carry the same full width paper rolls and used in thealternative, or can carry paper rolls of two different widths and usedin the alternative, or can carry two narrower paper rolls and usedsimultaneously to feed two side by side rolls of paper, which overlapslightly during the lamination process. The same is true for the twoseparate bottom feed stock rolls 40 b.

The batt 10 continues to pass between the upper and lower Teflonconveyor belts, carried by alternating upper and lower compressionrollers and compression plates, which gradually reduce the thickness ofthe laminated batt to the target thickness. Compression rolls 51 a-b,and 53 a-b are heated to from about 170° C. to about 190° C., whilerolls 55 a-b, 57 a-b and 59 a-b are cooled to about 40° F. to about 55°F. Similarly, compression plates 52 a-b and 54 a-b are heated to fromabout 170° C. to about 190° C., while plates 56 a-b and 58 a-b arecooled to about 40° F. to about 55° F. In this manner, binding fibers inthe fibrous batt continue to be adhering and tacky and can adhere batt10 the paper stock 20. When the paper faced batt 10 reaches the coolingrollers and cooling compression plates, the heated and tacky binderfibers begin to solidify and complete the adherence process, bothbetween the large paper particles 11 in the batt 10, and between thebatt 10 and the paper 20 laminated to each opposing face of the batt.

As the laminated assembly of paper 20 and batt 10 passes the finalcompression rolls 59 a and 59 b, it passes through longitudinal cutters60 adjustably mounted on a support 61. This cuts the lamination todesired widths. The lamination so cut then passes a guillotine cutterblade 70 which cross-cuts the batt to desired lengths.

The resulting packaging insulation panels 1 are cut to desireddimensions for specific packaging insulation requirements, are fromabout 1 to about 3 inches thick, and have a density of from about one toabout seven pounds per cubic foot. The batts 10 are so well integratedthat it is not necessary to wrap the exposed edges with the paper 20.The packaging insulation panels 1 can be shipped flat and compressed foreconomy of shipment. When they are unpacked at the customer's location,they expand back to at least near their original thickness, and can befolded to fit the packaging container 30 in which product is to beshipped. Preferably, two panels 1 a and 1 b are provided for eachpackage (FIG. 6), one of which can be folded to cover the bottom, rearside and top of the container 30 (FIGS. 7 and 8), and the other of whichcan be folded to cover the two ends and front side of the container 30.

The entire assembly of container 30 and insulating panels 10 can berepulped separately or together. The insulating panels 10 per se havebeen tested by an affirmed repulpability and recyclability recognizedUniversity test site and certified repulpable and recyclable inaccordance with the industry accepted Fiber Box Association (FBA)testing protocols.

Of course, it is understood that the above are preferred embodiments ofthe invention, and that various changes and alterations can be madewithout departing from the spirit and scope of the invention.

1. container insulation, comprising: a batt comprised of large paper particles, at least 90% of which are greater than 10 mm in diameter; 5% or less binder fibers, which have a length of at least 20 mm.
 2. The container insulation of claim 1 in which said batt is faced with paper.
 3. The container insulation of claim 2 in which said batt is free of binder fibers.
 4. The container insulation of claim 3 which is shaped to be fitted to the interior of a cardboard box shipping container.
 5. The container insulation of claim 4 which is re-pulpable and recyclable.
 6. The container insulation of claim 5 in which the particle size distribution for said paper particles is: Size (mm) Weight % Range 10 mm or less Less than 5% 10-20 mm 50-60% 20-30 mm 20-30% 30-40 mm 10-20% 40 mm or greater Up to 5%


7. The container insulation of claim 6, in which said batt is about ¼ to about 3 inches thick and has a density from about one to about seven pounds per cubic foot.
 8. The container insulation of claim 7 in which prior to compression into said batt, said paper particles have a moisture content of between 10 and 20%, more preferably 14-16%.
 9. The container insulation of claim 8 in which prior to compression into said batt, said paper particles have a density of 4-5 grams per 8 volume ounces (0.017-0.021 g/cc.).
 10. The container insulation of claim 9 in which said batt has exposed edges which are not wrapped with said facing paper.
 11. The container insulation of claim 1 which is re-pulpable and recyclable.
 12. The container insulation of claim 11 in which the particle size distribution for said paper particles is: Size (mm) Weight % Range 10 mm or less Less than 5% 10-20 mm 50-60% 20-30 mm 20-30% 30-40 mm 10-20% 40 mm or greater Up to 5%


13. The container insulation of claim 12, in which said batt is about ¼ to about 3 inches thick and has a density of from about one to about seven pounds per cubic foot.
 14. The container insulation of claim 1 in which the particle size distribution for said paper particles is: Size (mm) Weight % Range 10 mm or less Less than 5% 10-20 mm 50-60% 20-30 mm 20-30% 30-40 mm 10-20% 40 mm or greater Up to 5%


15. The container insulation of claim 14, in which said batt is about ¼ to about 3 inches thick and has a density of from about one to about seven pounds per cubic foot.
 16. The container insulation of claim 1 in which prior to compression into said batt, said paper particles have a moisture content of between 10 and 20%, more preferably 14-16%.
 17. The container insulation of claim 16 in which prior to compression into said batt, said paper particles have a density of 4-5 grams per 8 volume ounces (0.017-0.021 g/cc.).
 18. A method for forming a container insulation batt comprising: providing large paper particles, at least 90% of which are greater than 10 mm in diameter; mixing said large paper particles with 5% or less binder fibers, which have a length of at least 20 mm; compressing said large paper particles and said binder fibers into a container insulation batt.
 19. The method of claim 18 in which paper coated with a biodegradable coating is applied to said batt
 20. The method of claim 19 in which no binder fibers are mixed with said larger paper particles.
 21. The method of claim 20 in which said large paper particles as provided have a moisture content of between 10 and 20%, more preferably 14-16%.
 22. The method of claim 21 in which said paper particles as provided have a density of 4-5 grams per 8 volume ounces (0.017-0.021 g/cc.).
 23. The method of claim 23 in which said large paper particles as provided have a particle size distribution as follows: Size (mm) Weight % Range Specific Example 10 mm or less Less than 5% 4.70% 10-20 mm 50-60% 56.80% 20-30 mm 20-30% 22.04% 30-40 mm 10-20% 12.44% 40 mm or greater Up to 5% 4.01%


24. A method for forming a container insulation batt comprising: forming paper particles with an attrition mill with a plate spacing of about ½″; applying moisture in the form of water and steam to said paper after it is milled in said attrition mill; sizing the paper particles produced by said attrition mill such that at least 90% of the said particles to be used in a batt are greater than 10 mm in diameter; 5% or less binder fibers, which have a length of at least 20 mm; compressing said paper particles into an insulating batt.
 25. The method of claim 24 in which water and steam are applied at a rate which yields paper particles having a moisture content of between 10 and 20%, more preferably 14-16%.
 26. The method of claim 24 in which said paper particles are sized to the following particle size distribution: Size (mm) Weight % Range Specific Example 10 mm or less Less than 5% 4.70% 10-20 mm 50-60% 56.80% 20-30 mm 20-30% 22.04% 30-40 mm 10-20% 12.44% 40 mm or greater Up to 5% 4.01%


27. The method of claim 26 in which said paper particles are mixed with less than 5% binder fibers having a length of at least 20 mm. 